Should American Jews allow
Israel to commit suicide?
By Michael Anbar
Israel Insider, November 28, 2005
In the last few days there has been an uproar about
the extensive concession Condoleezza Rice managed to extract from PM Sharon.
People called to protest that pressure exerted by the US Secretary of State on
Israel, which might have disastrous consequences for the Jewish state in the
long run. I have serious a problem with that protest, as I question not only its
effectiveness but also its justification.
I can understand Condi's position. However, it is
hard for to me to understand how and why Israel has recently become a banana
republic in the true sense of the word. Clearly the corruption of the Israeli
administration allowed Condi to achieve whatever the Arabists in the State
Department have been asking for since the establishment of Israel in 1948.
However, I see no point in sending protests to the American Administration that
follows a policy it believes is the best interest of the United States (with
which I strongly dis! agree).
This is purely the US's business and it will be
America that will bear the consequences of this policy by losing its
international stature in the foreseeable future. Caving in to demands of the
Muslims today is not different than trying to appease the Communists during the
Cold War. Consequently, it is not impossible that the US will be ready at some
point in time to sacrifice the Jewish state for political gain, as GB did to
Czechoslovakia in 1938. In any case, it is not for the US to safeguard the
national interests of the Jewish state -- this is up to the Jewish people.
If the Israelis do not revolt against the
disastrous policies of their own government, why should I, here in the US, act
against their collective will? Why should I object if they prefer to accept the
dictates of the pro-Arab US Department of State? Israeli polls indicate that
Sharon will be reelected as PM in his new party. This means that the majority of
Israelis endorse his suicidal pol! icy, which contradicts everything Israel was
standing for in the past in the political arena. The Condi episode is not an
outrage to be condemned, but a direct consequence of Israeli policy in the last
few years.
It boils down to an ethical question: Does one have
the right to prevent an individual with full mental capacity from willfully
committing suicide? Essentially, it is a conflict between traditional ethics
based on Jewish religious premises, and the "modern" secular principle of
promoting the rights of the individual above those of society. "Liberal
universalists," including the majority of liberal Jews, disavow traditional
ethics in favor of individual rights (see their support of arbitrary abortion,
euthanasia and other self-destructive modes of individual and social behavior).
Why then should one wonder about their indifference witnessing the suicide of
the Jewish nation? Certainly, they are not going to prevent it.
What is truly surprising is the Isra! elis'
behavior, which is strikingly reminiscent of the behavior of European Jewry
during the Holocaust -- following a cowardly, self-serving leadership that cowed
to the intimidation of their mortal enemies (those leaders seemingly started to
believe that Jews are truly subhuman and therefore have no civil rights, just as
many Israelis seem to believe today that the State of Israel has no sovereign
rights). No Israeli PM before Sharon was ready to capitulate, virtually
unconditionally; to give up without anything tangible in return vital political
and territorial positions, one after the other, under diplomatic and/or economic
pressure.
We must learn form history. Like the Muslims today,
Hitler did not hide his intent to eradicate the Jews, and he was fairly
successful -- he eradicated a third of the world's Jewry. Most Israelis and many
American Jews (at least those who continue to support Sharon or his
anti-national, i.e., anti-Zionist, socialist allies) seem to utterly! ignore the
explicit Islamic mortal threats against Israel and the Jews (just because they
are Jews, very much like Hitler did).
They seem to have lost not only their traditional
national-religious values and their political compass (giving up Zionism amounts
to giving up Jewish national identity -- please open up the Bible or the Siddur),
but also a basic biological imperative -- the instinct of survival, both at the
national and individual levels.