Beware of a false dawn
By Isi Leibler
Israel Insider/ March 16, 2003
The impending war and its subsequent impact on the
region makes it mandatory for leaders in the national camp to review their
current policies and future strategies.
Over the past months our leaders have been
reassuring Israelis that President George W. Bush would never impose a
Palestinian state on Israel unless our basic security requirements had been met
and the Palestinian Authority "reformed" itself. Israel was also told not to be
too concerned with the Quartet's road map, against which it had registered over
100 objections.
As a nation that has suffered more than its fair
share of self-delusion, it is crucial that during these critical times we resist
duping ourselves into heralding yet another false dawn. Take the following
chilling scenario:
The Americans achieve a clear-cut military victory
in Iraq. They decide to rebuild their bridges with the Europeans and the rest of
the world. Britain's Tony Blair, whose own political future remains at risk,
pleads with Bush to impose a peace settlement in the Middle East and to do so in
"an evenhanded" manner in conjunction with the Quartet. Bush stands by his loyal
British ally and announces his determination to "end the cycle of violence" and
achieve a Middle East peace settlement in which both partners are obliged to
make sacrifices.
Arafat, who by now has fulfilled the Quartet's
requirement to "democratize" by appointing his deputy as prime minister, remains
in effective control. Under his instructions the Palestinians effusively welcome
the president's statement and call on Israel to withdraw its forces and "end the
occupation." They also undertake "to do their best" to halt terrorism,
especially within Israel proper.
Notwithstanding Israel's "very close" relationship
with the Americans, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer calls on the IDF to
withdraw to pre-intifada positions, demands an immediate freeze on all
settlements, and states that the time is now ripe for an immediate resumption of
negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon calls on President Bush
and pleads that Israel cannot accept demands which amount to rewarding
terrorism. He reminds the president that the Palestinians' end goal remains the
destruction of Israel and that they are still not willing to take the necessary
steps to root out terrorism.
Sharon fails to persuade Bush, and Israel once
again assumes the role of sacrificial lamb. The US suspends economic aid and
threatens to impose economic sanctions. The Europeans, with great delight,
institute a total boycott. A Palestinian state is enthusiastically endorsed by
the international community.
A few years later we wake up one morning and learn
that hostile forces are massing on our borders.
AN UGLY scenario indeed. And highly improbable. But
utterly inconceivable?
No. In fact, in terms of previous cozy
understandings or reliance upon friends, elements of this nightmare are deja vu.
To forestall such events Israel must initiate an
international campaign outlining the security requirements Israel regards as
crucial prerequisites before it can endorse a Palestinian state.
Israel needs to emphasize that its position is
based on the Middle East policy speech delivered by Bush on June 24, which
clearly makes Palestinian statehood conditional on prior democratic reform and
implicitly endorses:
* The necessity of the Palestinians to explicitly
announce an end to the conflict and forgo an Arab right of return.
* A Palestinian commitment to demilitarization,
which Israel will supervise and enforce without reliance on third parties.
* Demonstration of Palestinian willingness and
ability to control terror.
* An enforceable commitment to ensure that
incitement against Jews in Palestinian schools, mosques and media will be
suppressed.
Israel must remind its friends that this is not a
conflict between two peoples over land. It is about the Arab rejection of our
right to Jewish sovereignty in our homeland. It must also reiterate that the
society Arafat has created is an evil entity which endorses child sacrifice,
indoctrinates youngsters in schools and mosques and sanctifies as martyrs those
who murder Jews.
However, Israel should be under no illusions.
We will lose this vital battle in the war of ideas
if in the midst of such a campaign the government collapses as a consequence of
squabbles within the national camp.
It
is therefore high time and absolutely critical for the Right hard-liners in
Likud as well as the NRP and National Union to become realistic, more pragmatic
and flexible rather than dogmatically taking "principled" stands and isolating
themselves from the mainstream into barren opposition roles.
Politics amounts to the art of the possible. Like
it or not, the entire international community, including our only remaining
friends, the Americans, is now fully committed to the establishment of a
Palestinian state. And while most sane Israelis obviously oppose a Palestinian
state under the current circumstances, it is also clear that in the context of a
settlement, the vast majority of Israelis would be willing to endorse
Palestinian statehood.
We now stand at a crucial crossroads. Those opposed
to a Palestinian state under any circumstances must realize that no policy can
be permanently engraved in stone.
Should a crisis erupt in our relations with the
Americans, there is a vital need for the presence of representatives of the
national camp to act as watchdogs in government against those willing to make
compromises without adequate security safeguards.
If, after losing a battle, they retreat once again
into opposition they will create a vacuum, paving the way for the formation of a
government which could include unreconstructed Oslo apologists and other
defeatists. Paradoxically, under these circumstances resignation from the
government would amount to a prescription for accelerating the formation of a
Palestinian state under the worst possible conditions.
We have an extraordinarily good case, which would
be utterly undermined by the government's collapse. If we can succeed in winning
the hearts and minds of decent people and convince our American friends that we
are fighting the same battle against Arab fundamentalism and international
terror, Israel will overcome.
Isi Leibler is the senior vice
president of the World Jewish Congress. A former head of the Australian Jewish
community, he now lives in Jerusalem. He was a leading personality in the
movement to free Soviet Jewry and is a prolific writer on Jewish affairs.